ABSTRACT
Background: Lipid lowering action of oral hypoglycemic drugs is still unclear. Hence, this study was conducted to address the same using monotherapy and with combination of oral hypoglycemic in patients suffering with type 2 diabetes. Aims and Objectives: The main aim and objective of the study was to evaluate the DPP4 inhibitors inducted changes in low-density lipoprotein (LDL), VLSL, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and total cholesterol (TC) in patients suffering with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods: This randomized control study was done in the Department of General Medicine, Chennai Medical College Hospital and Research Center, Irungalur, Tiruchirappalli, between June 2014 and July 2015. Cases with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) aged 30–70 years who had been on glibenclamide or metformin for the past 3 months and had uncontrolled blood glucose levels were selected for the study. Total 180 patients are fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were divided into six groups (Each with 30 patients.) At the 0th and 12th weeks, fasting lipid profile was assessed. The data were expressed in number, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. Results: Oral hypoglycemic drug either as monotherapy or in combination has significant effect on lipid profile among the cases with T2DM. Furthermore, the significant decrease in TC and maximum improvement in HDL was noted with the use of glibenclamide in combination with Sitagliptin and maximum reduction in triglycerides and LDL was noted with the use of Metformin in combination with Sitagliptin. Conclusion: Oral hypoglycemic agents have an additional favorable effect on lipid profile among the cases with T2DM.
ABSTRACT
Background: Antimicrobials are routinely prescribed in several disease conditions in which infections are established or suspected to be the reason for the illness. Excessive and irrational use of antimicrobials leads to development of drug resistance in microorganisms, besides increasing health-care expenditure. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) leads to increase in morbidity and mortality. The rational use of antimicrobials is a major health need in all countries. Hence, assessment of prescribing pattern of antimicrobials is essential for clinical, educational, and economic purposes. Aims and Objectives: The objectives of the study were to evaluate and compare the prescribing pattern of antimicrobials by assessing – (i) commonly used antimicrobials; and (ii) disease conditions for which they were prescribed. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective observational study done for a period of 1 month. All the prescriptions in which antimicrobials were prescribed in the outpatient departments (OPD) and in-patient wards (IP) were included in the study. Prescriptions were analyzed for demographic and antibiotic data. Results: 1092 prescriptions were collected and analyzed. Among them, 690 prescriptions were from OPD and 382 prescriptions from in patient wards. Out patient data: Cefixime (21.30%) was commonly prescribed followed by fixed dose combination of Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (14.64%) and Ciprofloxacin (8.84%). Cefixime was commonly prescribed for URTI (13.43%). Oral route (82.17%) was the preferred route of administration. IP data: Cefotaxime (26.45%) was commonly prescribed followed by fixed dose combination of Piperacillin + Tazobactum (15.29%) and Ceftriaxone (14.46%). Cefotaxime was commonly prescribed preoperatively for most of the surgeries (76.56%). Intravenous route (46.86%) was the preferred route of administration. Single antimicrobial therapy (81.41%) was preferred followed by double (17.80%) and triple (0.79%) antimicrobial therapy. Conclusion: Cefixime and cefotaxime were commonly used in OPD and in patient wards, respectively. Oral route and intravenous route were the preferred route in OPD and IP wards, respectively. Single antimicrobial therapy was commonly preferred in both IP and out-patient wards. Although double and triple antimicrobial therapy was prescribed in small number of patients, it should be cautiously used to prevent AMR.